I took up Tina
Brown's The Vanity Fair Diaries (2017) in hopes of snarky
literary anecdotes, celebrity gossip, some inside information about editing and
the resurrection of the magazine under her leadership. There is some
of that, but in the first half there is too much self-aggrandizing narrative
about her and her husband's ambitions to own or rent ever-larger apartments in New
York City and in the Hamptons that they really cannot or at least should not afford. She crows a lot about her success as an editor, about the brilliant
writers she recruits, about the failings of colleagues or competitors. She
seems more interested (throughout the book) in talented writing as a means to
making the magazine successful rather than as an end in itself (this may well be a key to her success as an editor). I found this
aspect of the book irritating but by midpoint had devoted enough time to
the diaries that I felt obliged to finish reading them. An early anecdote is one of
the best: Brown describes a Hollywood party she attends at which the elderly
British novelist Dame Rebecca West is introduced to the British comedian Benny
Hill--the book is almost worth it for that one image of West staring down
wordlessly at Hill after she's been introduced. Brown’s assessment of Andy Warhol
seems to me right on target: that he was, after all the hype, a kind of monster
who exploited more than he created.
The book’s second half
significantly improves. Brown perhaps comes to feel more comfortable in New
York City, more confident in her work as a leading editor, more justified by
the accolades she receives. She certainly had achieved by the mid-1980s a
better understanding of the American scene. Her accounts of dinner parties and
of individuals whom she comes to know are better developed and more
penetrating. She seems at moments to be impressed by, even in thrall to, some
of the company she keeps, but at others to hold them at a cold and perceptive
distance.
One does wonder at some of that company: Henry Kissinger, for instance, and Donald Trump, who appears
increasingly often through the 1980s and into the 1990s. Brown may be fascinated in a way by Trump, but
in no way is she deceived: she regards him as the worst of the New York City
world, the worst of America. I’d be
interested to know the extent to which she revised her diaries as she prepared them for publication, whether she made efforts to foreground Trump in light of his
ascendance to the presidency. I could not fault her for doing so. (A number of individuals who played a role in
Harry Hurt III’s biography of Trump, The Lost Tycoon, are mentioned in Brown’s diaries.)
The diaries end with Brown’s
decision to take on the editorship of The
New Yorker. An epilogue brings
readers up to date on later events in her career.
No comments:
Post a Comment