In the foreground of Hell
or High Water (2016; dir. David Mackenzie) are two bank robbing brothers
and two Texas Rangers who pursue them. In the background is the American
Southwest, not only the dramatic scenes we all recognize (buttes and spires and
desert) but also small towns and cities on the verge of disappearing. The film
shows us devastated landscapes: strip malls, former farm fields full of oil
wells or refineries or pump stations, abandoned equipment, rotting houses,
empty streets and stores. This contemporary Western drama operates on several
levels: that of the robbers and the lawmen who pursue them, but also that of a deeply
tragic drama of economic forces, greed, and corporate ambitions that are
victimizing people who live in the old Southwest and once earned their living
there.
The bank robbing brothers, Tanner and Toby Howard, lived and
grew up on a farm that always struggled to survive. Their mother, who died shortly
before the start of the film, took out a reverse mortgage in an attempt to save
the farm, but after her death the brothers discover that nothing is left: the
banks are about to foreclose on the farm and sell it to oil companies that will
pump the oil that is below the now abandoned fields around it. Economic
exploitation by banks and corporations and entire populations of people are of
primary interest. In one scene Texas Ranger Marcus Hamilton (Jeff Bridges) and
Alberto Parker (Gil Birmingham) are sitting in front of a store in a town that
seems almost abandoned. They are staking out a bank which they believe the robbers
will soon hit. Marcus Hamilton likes to make fun of his partner’s Mexican and Comanche
ancestry. He makes frequent jokes that are probably intended to show his
fondness for Parker but which actually hurt Parker's feelings, though he
doesn't say much to show it. Parker and Hamilton are hard-bitten Southwest
characters who are close friends but who can never manage to express affection
for each other. As they watch the bank, Parker makes a point of telling
Hamilton that 150 years in the past all the land they are looking at belonged
to "his people," meaning the Comanches. He notes that the ancestors
of the people who now live in this town took the land away from the Comanches,
and that now the banks have taken their livelihood too. It's an ongoing cycle
of exploitation, of economic cannibalism, cultural cannibalism.
Given these themes, there are no clear moral dividing lines
in this film. What the bank robbing brothers are doing (robbing banks to
acquire enough money to save their farm) is against the law. They understand
that. But there's also a reason why they are robbing banks, and it's not greed.
It's survival. At least this is the case for the brother named Toby (Chris
Pine). He's never been a lawbreaker. He was married, is now divorced, is the
father of two sons, and is on uneasy terms with his ex-wife. While his brother
Tanner served time in prison for an unspecified crime, Toby spent the last
several years before the film’s beginning taking care of his mother before she
died of colon cancer. He feels he's done just about everything wrong in his
life, and he plans to use the money he acquires from robbing banks to save the
farm, which he will deed to his sons as a way of trying to do something good.
His brother understands what he wants to do, and because he is his brother,
agrees to help him. There's wild recklessness in Tanner: he loves robbing
banks. He loves danger. He doesn't care about breaking the law. All of these
things make him different from his brother.
Texas Ranger Hamilton is determined to catch these robbers,
but he also admires the way they have planned their heists--he sees an
intelligent mind at work, and he deduces many facts that turn out to be true.
He comes to understand their motives.
Hamilton has much in common with Sheriff Ed Tom Bell of the
Coen brothers film No Country for Old Man
(2007), based on Cormac McCarthy's novel (2005). He's close to retirement. In
fact, he is scheduled for retirement. But he wants a last opportunity to
investigate a series of crimes and to catch the perpetrators. It offers
excitement for him. It also offers him a last chance to work with his partner
Alberto. Hamilton strikes me as the most nuanced and interesting character in
the film. But I would also say that Toby Howard's character is rounded,
three-dimensional, and nuanced. That there are no moral absolutes apparent in
this film, and that all the characters in one way or the other have a
conflicted and troubling past, makes for a wonderful ambiguity that becomes the
film’s great strength.
Perhaps saying that there are no moral absolutes in this
film is incorrect. It's difficult to apply traditional moral standards of right
and wrong to the actions of the characters because of what we learn about their
backgrounds, because of how events transpire. It is the cultural and economic
environment of the Texas Southwest to which we can apply moral absolutes.
Injustices are happening. People are losing their land and their heritage.
There is a century and a half long tradition of dispossessing people from their
land and their farms and their businesses. This legacy of exploitation causes
the crimes that occur in this film and leads to the death of four individuals
(no spoilers here).
Hell or High Water
never becomes morose or too serious. There are numerous moments of humor. There
are several minor or secondary characters who are clearly three-dimensional
figures: they have a past even though we don't know about it--it's alluded to.
We don't know about the struggle of the Howard brother’s mother to save the
farm. We don't know about the failed marriage of Toby and his wife Ginny, but
the film suggests that past is there. It suggests there is a past, a history, that
informs every moment of action.
Hell or High Water ends in ambiguity. The film resolves major aspects of its story, but it leaves some matters hanging. Many find such ambiguity dissatisfying. The irresolution of characters whose past histories are just hinted at, of situations that extend beyond the horizons of this film, are what make Hell or High Water the outstanding experience it is.
Hell or High Water ends in ambiguity. The film resolves major aspects of its story, but it leaves some matters hanging. Many find such ambiguity dissatisfying. The irresolution of characters whose past histories are just hinted at, of situations that extend beyond the horizons of this film, are what make Hell or High Water the outstanding experience it is.
No comments:
Post a Comment