Where do we place blame?
Discussions of the deplorable situation in Mexico, Columbia, and other
parts of the world embroiled in and torn by the illegal drug market either
ignore the question entirely or become so caught up in it that the problems on
the ground seem to disappear. We can
suggest that the market for cocaine and heroin in the United States creates the
demand that leads to the chaos and crime of Northern Mexico. No doubt that market exists, but it exists in
other parts of the world as well. The
demand for illegal drugs may help create the market, but if we somehow prove
that argument we have not addressed the drug trade itself. And if all we do is deplore the lawlessness
and terror that predominate in certain parts of such a place as Mexico, then we
ignore the cause, and if we don’t address the cause the market, somewhere,
somehow, is going to be there.
The film Sicario (2015,
dir. Denis Villeneuve) tries to consider cause.
The result is confusion. In one
long-distance shot, the camera pans from neatly ordered streets of an Arizona
border town across the river to a disorderly, chaotically arranged, decidedly
ominous Mexican town—presumably Juarez.
The music for the film, which relies on ominous drumbeats and portentous
groaning bass notes, colludes in the effect.
Here in Mexico we’re asked to see the Other, the dark and uncivilized
heart of the drug wars that seem to be infiltrating areas around the border
with the United States. Therefore, it’s
Mexico that is the problem.
But the film hedges its bets and in the end suggests that
not only has the demand for drugs in the US created the drug trade, but that
the tactics of certain US law enforcement and security units devised the
tactics that came to be the stock and trade in terror of the Mexican drug
lords. In this case, it’s the CIA that
has become involved in trying to subdue the drug lords, but in so doing its
operatives sink to a level of lawlessness and terror that is, so the film would
have it, hardly separate from that of the drug lords itself. This is simplistic.
I hoped to find in this movie an intelligent attempt at portraying and even understanding the problem. Instead, I found a veneer of ultra-realism, suspense, and first-person shooter video game substituting for perceptiveness. The film tries to mimic the method of faux documentaries like Zero Dark Thirty, Black Hawk Down, Syriana but the result is an action adventure film that pretends to be more than it is.
I hoped to find in this movie an intelligent attempt at portraying and even understanding the problem. Instead, I found a veneer of ultra-realism, suspense, and first-person shooter video game substituting for perceptiveness. The film tries to mimic the method of faux documentaries like Zero Dark Thirty, Black Hawk Down, Syriana but the result is an action adventure film that pretends to be more than it is.
No comments:
Post a Comment